Run design review AI agents at scale

Run AI-assisted design reviews to save review time and catch more errors on projects.
Built for engineering teams that prioritize both quality & speed.

How it works

Built by a team with experience from

The best way to use AI for QAQC

Workflow · Electrical design review
Cover revision matches the issued package30%60%90%IFC
POI and interconnection voltage on the one-line30%60%90%IFC
EGC from each inverter skid to the electrode30%60%90%IFC

Instruction Confirm an equipment grounding conductor runs from each skid to the grounding electrode, sized per the one-line and NEC 250.122.

Disconnect ratings identified at each skid30%60%90%IFC
Fault current on drawings matches the study30%60%90%IFC
New itemBulk new itemsExtract from a file

Workflows

Your checklist, as a workflow.

Turn your checklists into detailed workflow instructions that agents can run. Bring them in from Excel, PDF, or Word, tag each item by milestone, and let AI enrich the instructions over time.

Reviews · Electrical 60%

EGC from each inverter skid to the electrode

SKID 03GND ELECEGCNo EGC shown from skidto grounding electrode.E-201

Agent response

MajorE-201 Grounding planp.4

No equipment grounding conductor is shown from Skid 03 to the grounding electrode.

1 proposed comment

PassFailN/ARetry

Findings

Every finding lands on the sheet.

Get findings you can verify in seconds. Each one comes back with a severity, the agent’s reasoning, a citation to the exact sheet, and a proposed comment boxed on the drawing. You rule Pass, Fail, or N/A, and only a Fail marks up the set.

Running · 02:14
Cover revision matches the issued packagePass
EGC from each inverter skid to the electrodeMajor
Disconnect ratings identified at each skidWarning
Fault current on drawings matches the studyCritical
Homerun ampacity in the inverter scheduleAnalyzing…
Cable schedule matches the one-lineAnalyzing…
Reference documentsAuto-fetch

Reviews

Every item, at once.

Run your whole checklist at once, with an agent on every item. Pick the drawing set and the items, and agents work in parallel, pulling in the reference documents they need. Rerun any item with your feedback.

Comment Log.xlsx
ExcelMarked-up PDF

Comment Log

TitleSeverityCommentEOR Response
EGC from skid to electrodeMajorNo EGC shown from Skid 03 to the electrode.
Disconnect ratingsWarningDS-2 rating not identified on E-001.
Fault current vs studyCriticalPNL-H1 shows 14.0 kA; SC-001 gives 22.4 kA.

Exports

Findings leave as the comment log.

Hand findings off in the format your team already uses. Export the comment log to Excel in your own template, with columns for the EOR’s response, or download the PDF with every failed comment on the drawing.

Cover every milestone of the design phase

Checklist items
10%30%60%90%IFC
EGC from skid to electrode
Disconnect ratings at each skid
Fault current matches the study

2 of 3 selected

Package review

Tag each item by stage and run the ones that apply to the issue in front of you: 30%, 60%, 90%, or IFC.

Split view
34.5 kV COLLECTIONSKID 03EGCGND ELECE-001SKID 03GND ELECEGCNo EGC shown from skidto grounding electrode.E-201

Interdisciplinary

Open drawings side by side in split view, and run each discipline’s workflow on the same set.

Agent response
Critical

PNL-H1 shows 14.0 kA available fault current; the study gives 22.4 kA.

SC-001 Short-circuit studyp.2E-105 Panel schedulep.1

Studies & reports

Load studies, specs, and standards as reference documents. Findings cite the study and the sheet together.

Agent response
Warning

Feeder F-3 is specified at 600 A; the calculated load it serves is 310 A.

E-001 One-linep.2Load calculationp.6

Value engineering

Write items that look for oversizing, and the surplus comes back as a cited finding.

Let’s build a better way.

Sign up